LIKE OKAY. Y’all wanna discuss the ethics of vampires stealing from blood banks??
1) The blood in banks has been (God willing) freely given away. There are no consent issues there because I agreed they could get the blood out of my veins and give it to someone in need.
2) BUT??? Do I know vampires exist?? Maybe I don’t. Maybe I think the blood is going to humans. If it’s going to vampires instead, well, that isn’t what I agreed to, and that could be skivvy.
3) Furthermore, if the vampire drinks my blood, humans that needed it won’t get it… but they both need it. So how do you decide who deserves it? Who decides what life is worth saving? Why is the hospitalised human more deserving of blood than the starving vampire?
4) Maybe the human being is paying for it in his hospital fees, and the vampire is not. But does the vampire deserve to starve just cause he hasn’t any money??
5) Or maybe the vampire is centuries-old and has lived plenty already, so maybe he should fuck off and let humans, with their puny lifespans, get help first. Y’all know this is a Whole Thing already with life expectancy and transplant lists, right?.
6) Or actually, why is this being treated as a zero-sum game, like the vampire is taking blood bags directly out of patient’s IVs, instead of a blood bank that can manage stock, even with difficulties? Maybe we should back up and try to fix the blood bank stock issue before harassing vampires about it?
SEE, THIS IS HOW YOU MAKE FUN VAMPIRE DISCOURSE.